In the state of Texas, Licensed Professional Counselor (LPC) Associates face unique challenges when it comes to billing insurance directly for their services. Although Associates can now be in private practice, insurance companies have been slow to update their policies and paneling procedures, making it difficult for LPC Associates to bill insurance independently. In this blog post, we will explore the current limitations faced by LPC Associates in Texas and also discuss the benefits of not utilizing insurance, including increased privacy and control over treatment.
The Insurance Challenge
As it stands, many insurance companies in Texas do not panel LPC Associates at this time. This means that Associates are unable to bill directly to insurance for the services they provide. The slow process of updating insurance policies and paneling procedures has created a situation where LPC Associates are left without the ability to access insurance reimbursement for their clients.
Out-of-Network Billing
While some insurers now allow out-of-network billing, there are complications when it comes to LPC Associates. Insurance companies may deny claims submitted for services rendered by provisionally licensed counselors, causing additional frustration for both the Associate and their clients. This restriction further limits the ability of LPC Associates to offer their services to a wider range of individuals who rely on insurance coverage for mental health treatment.
The Group Practice Solution
One option available to LPC Associates in Texas is to work at a group practice. By doing so, Associates can engage in incident-to billing, which involves billing under the credentials of another therapist, typically their supervisor at the practice. This method allows Associates to bypass the current insurance limitations and bill insurance directly for their services. However, this solution does come with its own set of considerations, such as sharing revenue with the group practice and potentially sacrificing some autonomy.
Benefits of Not Utilizing Insurance
While the inability to bill insurance directly presents challenges for LPC Associates, there are some advantages to not relying on insurance for reimbursement. Here are a few benefits worth considering:
1. Increased Privacy:
When clients choose not to utilize insurance, their treatment records remain private. Insurance companies often require the submission of diagnoses and treatment plans, which become part of the client’s permanent medical record. Opting out of insurance allows for increased confidentiality and control over personal health information.
2. Greater Autonomy and Flexibility:
By not relying on insurance, LPC Associates have the freedom to determine the duration and modality of therapy that best suits their clients’ needs. Treatment decisions are made collaboratively between the client and therapist, rather than being dictated by insurance coverage limitations or pre-authorization requirements.
3. Streamlined Documentation:
Without the need to satisfy insurance company requirements, LPC Associates can focus more on providing effective therapy and less on extensive documentation for billing purposes. This allows for a more streamlined therapeutic process and increased efficiency in delivering care.
4. Client-Focused Approach:
Opting out of insurance reimbursement can allow LPC Associates to prioritize their client’s best interests without being influenced by insurance restrictions. This creates an environment where treatment decisions are driven by client needs, fostering a stronger therapeutic relationship and potentially more effective outcomes.
The Policies May Change
While LPC Associates in Texas currently face challenges when it comes to billing insurance directly for their services, it is essential to explore alternative options and consider the benefits of not utilizing insurance. Increased privacy, greater autonomy, and a client-focused approach are among the advantages of opting out of insurance reimbursement. It is important for LPC Associates to weigh the pros and cons carefully and make informed decisions that best align with their practice goals and the needs of their clients. As the landscape of insurance policies continues to evolve, it is crucial for insurance companies to recognize the vital role LPC Associates play in providing mental health care and adjust their paneling and billing procedures accordingly.
Hi Mark,
Thank you for the article. I know Aetna and Cigna now allow supervisory billing for LPC-Associates. When we inquired with BCBS, they state that due to state (Texas) regulations they are not allowing this. I’ve tried looking where it states this is not allowed. Could you direct me in the right direction?
Thanks,
Hi Jennifer,
This will vary based on each insurance company and their contract. I have never worked with insurance directly, so my knowledge comes second-hand. To your point, yes, some panels allow supervisory billing. This requires your supervisor is in-network and that you bill through their practice. As far as I know, this would not allow you to bill insurance in your own practice. Admittedly, I could be wrong. Things change quickly sometimes.
I’m also not certain what legislation BCBS would be referring to. I’ll do some digging.
Mark, were you able to find anything in the Texas Administrative Code regarding associate billing? The TAC used to prohibit associate billing, but the language I’m seeing now doesn’t prohibit billing – it just doesn’t specify that insurance can or cannot be billed.
https://texreg.sos.state.tx.us/public/readtac$ext.TacPage?sl=R&app=9&p_dir=&p_rloc=&p_tloc=&p_ploc=&pg=1&p_tac=&ti=22&pt=30&ch=681&rl=91
Would billing also be limited to LPC-Supervisors who are contracted as part of a group practice rather than individually credentialed?
Hi Krista,
Nothing in the code that I could find. There was previously language stating that Associates could not receive payment for services directly, but this was removed upon the update which allows them to operate their own practices.
To your second question, I believe so. Again, I don’t work with insurance or ever have. It is my understanding that it would be billed under a group practice.
Hi Jennifer,
Have you any information either other insurances like Texas Medicaid, Amerigroup, Molina, Carelon (Beacon), Optum, WellCare, Magellan, Christus Health and Humana are allowed supervisory billing for LPC-Associates?
I would like to know as well. It seems like for telehealth providers, getting panneled is a perk some companies are offering LPCAs. However, it does come with a cost. I already have a supervsior outside of my work with clients, so it might not be worth it to me. These companies are really trying to recurit LPCAs from Texas. They are located in Washington and Oregon. Not sure if it is the right fit for me, but am willing to look more into what they are about.
I’d be interested to learn more as well. Again, I’m certainly no expert when it comes to world of insurance.